Continuing Education (CE)

The continuing education article below is available to subscribers of Endodontic Practice US. In order to earn continuing education credits, you must be a Free or Paid subscriber and complete a short quiz about the content of the article. Our Free CE is limited to only 2 free credit hours per year.

Purchase a subscription now.

Foraminal enlargement analysis

CE Publish Date: March 14, 2016
CE Expiration Date:
CEU (Continuing Education Unit): Credit(s)
AGD Code:

Educational aims and objectives
This clinical article aims to make a critical analysis, based on the literature, to assess the advantages and disadvantages and the local and systemic risks related to the intentional enlargement of the apical foramen.

Expected outcomes
Endodontic Practice US subscribers can answer the CE questions to earn 2 hours of CE from reading this article. Correctly answering the questions will demonstrate the reader can:

Realize that there is no scientific evidence to support intentional foramen enlargement in humans.

Recognize that the methodological design of future studies for performing this procedure should be undertaken with caution, because the literature consulted in this paper reiterates that intentional foraminal enlargement poses both local and systemic risks.

Drs. Frederico Canato Martinho, Ricardo Machado, Professor Carlos Henrique Ferrari, and Leticia Aguiar analyze the benefits and risks of intentional foraminal enlargement, considering the impact both locally and systemically



In recent years, endodontics has seen a considerable paradigm shift as a result of technical and scientific developments. However, the concept of shaping and cleaning (Schilder, 1974) remains one of the pillars of the specialty especially when dealing with infected canals.

Historically, the literature has demonstrated how anatomical complexities make it so difficult to adequately shape and clean the root canal system, especially the apical one-third (Paqué, et al., 2009; Paqué, et al., 2010). Furthermore, in some cases, endodontic infection extends beyond the limits of the apical constriction, for example, to the apical foramen or beyond (extraradical biofilm) (Noiri, et al., 2002; Chavez De Paz, 2007; Ricucci, Siqueira Jr, 2010). In these situations, intentional foraminal enlargement may be performed to decrease the microbial load to levels more favorable for repair (Borlina, et al., 2010). Previous studies have shown encouraging results for intentional foraminal enlargement, enabling more efficient mechanical action of instruments and the chemical action of irrigating solutions (de Souza Filho, et al., 1987).

Therefore, the purpose of this paper was to perform a critical literature review by analyzing the likely benefits and risks of intentional foraminal enlargement, considering the impact both locally and systemically.

Local effects

Anatomical considerations
Undeniably, pulp necrosis and peri-radicular lesions are an indication that the entire length of the root canal is contaminated (Ricucci, Siqueira Jr 2010, Tronstad, et al., 1990; Nair, et al., 2005, Siqueira, Rôças 2008). For this reason, the literature has postulated that apical patency can clear the apical foramen and promote microbiological disruption in this area, using a small caliber instrument to lightly touch the walls of the apical foramen (Buchanan, 1989; Cailleteau, Mullaney, 1997; Flanders, 2002; Souza 2006; Coutinho–Filho, et al., 2012; Mounce, 2015). However, intentional foraminal enlargement is performed with different techniques and instruments and consists of the mechanical enlargement of the apical foramen for the purpose of decontamination by excising infected dentin and cementum (Borlina, et al., 2010; Silva, et al., 2013). Accurate intentional foraminal enlargement requires the shape and diameter of the apical foramen to be accurately assessed and measured. Clinically, this would seem to be impossible (Dummer, et al., 1984; Abarca, et al., 2014). Conventional endodontic instruments are unable to perform this, because of the oval shape of the apical foramen (Goldberg, Massone, 2002; Marroquín, et al., 2004; Herrera, et al., 2011; Akisue, et al., 2014). Consequently, adequate cleaning cannot be achieved (Wu, et al., 2000; Marroquín, et al., 2004; Abarca, et al., 2014).

Several clinical studies have shown a high frequency of instrument fracture in the apical third when anatomically complex and narrow canals are present (Ehrhardt, et al., 2012; Madarati, et al., 2013). Moreover, especially when dealing with posterior teeth, the apical foramen may be located laterally to the anatomical apex (Pineda, Kuttler, 1972), and intentional foraminal enlargement may predispose to weakening of the tooth with a higher incidence of fracture.

Another factor limiting foraminal enlargement is the clinician’s inability to achieve apical potency of the apical foramen in some situations. This may occur because of abrupt curvatures, the existence of two or more main apical foramina, apical deltas, or complete or incomplete isthmuses (Meder–Cowherd, et al., 2011; Verma, Love, 2011; Villas–Bôas, et al., 2011).

Considering all the facts and appreciating that foraminal enlargement is a plausible idea from a microbiological standpoint, it cannot always be performed. In controlled clinical studies with robust samples and appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria (Imura, et al., 2007; Ricucci, et al., 2011; Liang, et al., 2013), there have been no reports of intentional foraminal enlargement in the clinical protocols adopted. Nonetheless, the success rates of these studies are high even in cases of pulp necrosis with radiographically visible periradicular disease (Imura, et al., 2007; Ricucci, et al., 2011; Liang, et al., 2013).

Extrusion of sodium hypochlorite, calcium hydroxide, and filling materials
Sodium hypochlorite is the most widely accepted and used irrigant solution worldwide (Stojicic, et al., 2010; Zou, et al., 2010; Wong, et al., 2014; Guneser, et al., 2015). Nonetheless, it has a highly adverse effect after extrusion into the periradicular tissues or maxillary sinus, or when injected into the gingival mucosa (Pashley, et al., 1985; Gatot, et al., 1991; Ehrich, et al., 1993; Kavanagh, et al., 1998; Kleier, et al., 2008; de Sermeño, et al., 2009; Wang, et al., 2010; Kerbl, et al., 2012).

The most common consequences of this type of accident are the following: (Hulsmann, Hahn, 2000; Serper, et al., 2004).

  • severe pain
  • instant inflammation of the affected area
  • swelling extended to the face, lips, and infraorbital region
  • hemorrhage descending from the root canal
  • interstitial hemorrhage with skin and mucosa bruising
  • secondary infection
  • paresthesia

The use of calcium hydroxide as an inter-appointment dressing can have adverse consequences if it is accidentally extruded beyond the apical foramen (Fava, 1993; Marais, Van Der Vyver, 1996). Fava (1993) as well as Marais and Van der Vyver (1996) reported cases of calcium hydroxide extrusion into the maxillary sinus, causing acute pain and a foreign body reaction. Ahlgren, et al., (2003), reported a case of calcium hydroxide extrusion into the mandibular canal with acute pain and paresthesia. Other adverse consequences associated with the extrusion of calcium hydroxide are neural injury (Olsen, et al., 2014), severe peri-radicular inflammation requiring the extraction of the involved tooth (Hanson, Macluskey, 2013), and the persistence of periradicular lesions (Ionnidis, et al., 2010).

Certain filling materials (mainly solids) are also responsible for several extrusion-related complications, such as radiographically visible foreign body reactions, flare-ups, and postoperative pain exacerbated by the activation of an inflammatory response (Oliet, 1983; Rowe, 1983; Georgopoulou, et al., 1987; Siqueira, 2003; Nair, 2004; Saleh, et al., 2004; Seltzer, Naidorf, 1985; Gluskin, 2005; Köseoglu, et al., 2006; González-Martín, et al., 2010; Faria-Júnior et al., 2013; Alves, et al., 2014). All materials extruded beyond the apical foramen are irritating to the periradicular tissues to a greater or lesser extent. There is no scientific evidence warranting the intentional extrusion of irrigating solutions, pastes, and cements (Strindberg, 1956; Engstrom, 1964; Yusuf, 1982; Nair, et al., 1990; Sjögren, et al., 1990; Orstavik, Hörsted–Bindslev, 1993).

It is important to consider the hypothesis that the greater the enlargement of the apical foramen, the greater the possibility of extrusion of any substance used in the root canal (Hülsmann, Hahn, 2000). Nevertheless, more research is required to confirm this hypothesis.

Systemic effects

Patients who are taking or have taken bisphosphonates recently
Bisphosphonates are drugs used to treat bone diseases and prevent tumor metastasis (Moinzadeh, et al., 2013). Their extensive use is directly related to osteonecrosis of the jaw after performing dental procedures (Katz, 2005; Sarathy, et al., 2005; Edwards, et al., 2008; Moinzadeh, et al., 2013). Since these drugs are widely used today, dentists should be knowledgeable about some likely effects that can influence the prognosis of the treatment.

Specifically related to endodontics, some important precautions should be borne in mind:

  • Antiseptics, such as chlorhexidine, must be used to reduce the bacterial load of the oral cavity (Cousido, et al., 2010) and the risk of bacte-remia, due to possible injury to soft tissues during the course of treatment (Moinzadeh, et al., 2013)
  • Anesthetics with vasoconstrictors should be avoided because the vasculature is compromised, constituting a greater risk for osteonecrosis, as bisphosphonates exert an antiangiogenic effect (Tarassoff, Csermak, 2003; Soltau, et al., 2008; Moinzadeh, et al., 2013).
  • Special care must be taken to reduce damage to the gingival tissue (Kyrgidis, Vahtsevanos, 2009; Moinzadeh, et al., 2013)
  • Filling techniques must be prioritized to pose the lowest risk of overfilling and overextension (Liang, et al., 2011; Moinzadeh, et al., 2013)

According to Katz (2005) and Edwards, et al., (2008), one of the main precautions in relation to patients who are making use or have recently made use of this class of drug is to establish a working length near the apical constriction and to decrease the extrusion of debris and exacerbated inflammatory reactions during and after treatment. Even foraminal patency should be avoided (Moinzadeh, et al., 2013) because it can considerably increase the chances of bacteremia (Debelian, et al., 1995; Moinzadeh, et al., 2013). These statements are based on bisphosphonates interfering directly with the bone remodeling process and inhibiting the chemical mediators of the inflammatory process (Katz, 2005; Edwards, et al., 2008).

When considering the need for endo-dontics in patients who are or have been using bisphosphonates recently, it seems obvious that intentional foraminal enlargement is a completely contraindicated procedure.

Patients with coagulation disorders or using anticoagulants
Homeostasis in healthy patients is associated with four main factors:

  • Blood vessel walls
  • Blood platelets
  • The coagulation system
  • The fibrinolytic system

Blood vessel constriction is the first stage, followed by platelet adhesion and aggregation, and by fibrin deposition. In the next stage, the coagulation process is regulated by physiological anticoagulants. Activation of fibrinolysis is triggered by the presence of fibrin and tissue plasminogen activator-types at the site of fibrin formation, a process regulated by physiologic inhibitors such as 2-antiplasmin, histidine-rich glycoprotein, and plasminogen activator inhibitor (DeLoughery, 1999; Scully, Wolff, 2002).

This process is completely different in patients with a coagulopathy or taking anticoagulants because of the risk of excessive bleeding, even from a gentle stimulus. Gingival bleeding during tooth cleaning may cause these patients to neglect their oral health, thus increasing the risk of perio-dontal disease and caries. For this reason, dentists should be knowledgeable about the impact of blood disorders or the use of anticoagulants in treating these patients (Johnson, Leary, 1988; Shapiro, McKown, 1990; Gupta, et al., 2007).

In patients with coagulation disorders or taking anticoagulants, and needing tooth extraction, conventional endodontic treatment or retreatment should be the preferred option whenever possible. However, the shaping and cleaning process must be confined to the limits of the root canal (Chohayeb, 1981), and intentional foraminal enlargement would be completely contraindicated.

Patients with a high risk of bacteremia
Several systemic complications from oral infections have been reported. Some of the most common include bacterial endo-carditis; myocardial infarction; cerebral abscess; bone, antral, and bloodstream infections (Baumgartner, et al., 1976; McGowan, 1982; Bender, Montgomery, 1986; Debelian, et al., 1994; Murray, Saunders, 2000; Scully, et al., 2003).

During endodontic treatment, the shaping and cleaning procedure has the potential to contaminate the bloodstream and the lymphatic system with bacteria (Bender, et al., 1960; Baumgartner, et al., 1976; Seymour, et al., 2000; Fouad, 2009).

Blood samples collected from patients during and after endodontic treatment of teeth with pulp necrosis revealed the presence of the same bacteria in both the root canal system and the bloodstream (Heimdahl, et al., 1990; Debelian, et al., 1995; Debelian, et al., 1998; Savarrio, et al., 2005). Therefore, microorganisms from the root canal can be carried to and then settle in locations distant from their place of origin (Fouad, 2009).

The extrusion of debris during shaping and cleaning of the root canal system has frequently been shown, regardless of the systems and techniques used (Reddy, Hicks, 1998; Bürklein, Schäfer, 2012; Koçak, et al., 2013; Kirchhoff, et al., 2015).

Tinaz, et al., (2005) conducted a study for the specific purpose of correlating debris extrusion and the apical limit of instrumentation. It compared the extrusion of debris during manual and rotary instrumentation in teeth that had intentionally enlarged apical constriction and apical foramen. Fifty-two teeth were divided into two groups with 26 specimens each, in accordance with the instrumentation technique used (manual instrumentation using K-files or rotary instrumentation using ProFile .04 taper series 29). The teeth were further divided into two subgroups, with intentional enlargement of the apical foramen by K-files No.15 and No. 30, 2 mm beyond the apical foramen. The irrigating solution was 2.6% sodium hypochlorite. No statistically significant differences between using manual and rotary instrumentation were found in relation to the extruded debris. However, both techniques showed a strong tendency to produce greater amounts of debris when the apical constriction and the apical foramen were intentionally enlarged.

Hence, instrumentation beyond the apical foramen should be avoided in patients at high risk for bacteremia, considering the greater risk of systemic spread of microorganisms (Debelian, et al., 1995; Seymour, et al., 2000; Siqueira, Rôças, 2008; Hülsmann, Schäfer, 2009; Baumann, Beer, 2011).

The difficulties in performing suitable shaping and cleaning of root canals, especially in the final millimeters, has been proven consistently (Paqué, et al., 2009; Paqué, et al., 2010; Haapasalo, et al., 2005; Hulsmann, et al., 2005; de Melo Ribeiro, et al., 2013; Cruz, et al., 2014). Consequently, a wider variety of techniques have been recommended to achieve more effective action from endodontic instruments (Olivieri, et al., 2014; Sant’Anna Júnior, et al., 2014) and irrigating solutions (van der Sluis, et al., 2007; Brunson, et al., 2010).

There are occasions when endodontic infection extends beyond the limits of the apical constriction — i.e., to the apical foramen or even beyond (extraradicular biofilm) (Noiri, et al., 2002; Chavez De Paz, 2007; Ricucci, Siqueira Jr, 2010). In these situations, intentional foraminal enlargement is designed to reduce the microbial load in these areas to levels more favorable for repair (Borlina, et al., 2010).

However, it must be pointed out that, to date, there have been only animal studies comparing the success rates between intentional foraminal enlargement and conventional instrumentation limits (close to the apical constriction) (Holland, et al., 1979; Borlina, et al., 2010). Even considering the positive results of these studies, there is no way to infer that this procedure will have the same positive biological responses in humans.

According to the precepts of scientific evidence-based dentistry, certain criteria must be respected and followed prior to any interventions in humans. First, laboratory studies should be performed to construct a plausible hypothesis to be tested in vivo. Then in vivo animal studies should be performed to observe any toxic or harmful potential of the substances, drugs, or intervention. Ultimately, longitudinal, controlled clinical studies are needed to observe the results and confirm possible advantages or disadvantages related to the previously considered hypothesis (Seymour, et al., 2003; Miller, Forrest, 2009; Kwok, et al., 2012).

When it comes to the question of intentional foraminal enlargement, there is no scientific evidence to support its use. To date, no randomized clinical trial has been conducted with longitudinal follow-ups, evaluating the success rates of endodontic treatments or retreatments where the apical limits of instrumentation were established for the apical foramen or beyond. On the other hand, high success rates have been reported for apical limits of instrumentation established close to the apical constriction in controlled clinical studies with robust samples and appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria (Imura, et al., 2007; Ricucci, et al., 2011; Liang, et al., 2013).

From a scientific perspective, it is obvious that the impacts of intentional foraminal enlargement on the success of endodontic therapy should be evaluated. However, the methodology of these studies should be even more carefully designed, insofar as the literature reviewed in this paper reiterates that this procedure poses both local and systemic risks to the patient.

Author Info

Carlos Henrique Ferrari, DDS, is a PhD endodontic student at São Jose dos Campos Dental School, State University of São Paulo – UNESP, São Jose dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.

Frederico Canato Martinho, DDS, MSc, PhD, is a professor of endodontics at São Jose dos Campos Dental School, State University of São Paulo – UNESP, São Jose dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.

Ricardo Machado, DDS, MSc, PhD, is a professor of multidisciplinary clinic I and II and supervised stage in multidisciplinary
clinic I (endodontics), Paranaense University – UNIPAR, Francisco Beltrão, Paraná, Brazil.

Leticia Aguiar is a graduate student from Paranaense University – UNIPAR, Francisco Beltrão, Paraná, Brazil.


  1. Abarca J, Zaror C, Monardes H, Hermosilla V, Muñoz C, Cantin M. Morphology of the physiological apical foramen in maxillary and mandibular first molars. Int J Morphol. 2014;32(2):671-677.
  2. Ahlgren FK, Johannessen AC, Hellem S. Displaced calcium hydroxide paste causing inferior alveolar nerve paraesthesia: report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;6(6):734-737.
  3. Akisue E, Gratieri SD, Barletta FB, Caldeira CL, Grazziotin-Soares R, Gavini G. Not all electronic foramen locators are accurate in teeth with enlarged apical foramina: an in vitro comparison of 5 brands. J Endod. 2014;40(1): 109-112
  4. Alves FR, Coutinho MS, Gonçalves LS. Endodontic–related facial paresthesia: systematic review. J Can Dent Assoc. 2014;80: e13.
  5. Beer R, Baumann MA. Color atlas of dental medicine: Endodontology. New York: Thieme;1999.
  6. Baumgartner JC, Heggers JP, Harrison JW. The incidence of bacteremias related to endodontic procedures I. Nonsurgical endodontics. J Endod. 1976;2(5):135–40.
  7. Bender IB, Montgomery S. Nonsurgical endodontic procedures for the patient at risk for infective endocarditis and other systemic disorders. J Endod. 1986;12(9):400-407.
  8. Bender I, Seltzer S, Yermish M. The incidence of bacteremia in endodontic manipulation: preliminary report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1960;13:353–360.
  9. Borlina SC, de Souza V, Holland R, Murata SS, Gomes-Filho JE, Dezan Junior E, Marion JJ, Neto Ddos A. Influence of apical foramen widening and sealer on the healing of chronic periapical lesions induced in dogs’ teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109(6): 932-940.
  10. Brunson M, Heilborn C, Johnson DJ, Cohenca N. Effect of apical preparation size and preparation taper on irrigant volume delivered by using negative pressure irrigation system. J Endod. 2010;36(4):721–724.
  11. Buchanan LS. Management of the curved root canal. J Calif Dent Assoc. 1989;17(4): 18-25, 27.
  12. Bürklein S, Schäfer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod. 2012; 38(6):850-852.
  13. Cailleteau JG, Mullaney TP. Prevalence of teaching apical patency and various instrumentation and obturation techniques in United States dental schools. J Endod. 1997;23(6): 394-396.
  14. Chavez de Paz LE. Redefining the persistent infection in root canals: possible role of biofilm communities. J Endod. 2007;3(6):652-662.
  15. Chohayeb A. Endodontic therapy in the hemophiliac patient. N Y State Dent J. 1981;47(6):326-327.
  16. Cousido MC, Tomás Carmona I, García-Caballero L, Limeres J, Alvarez M, Diz P. In vivo substantivity of 0.12% and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthrinses on salivary bacteria. Clin Oral Investig. 2010;14(4):397-402.
  17. Coutinho-Filho TS, Gurgel-Filho ED, Souza-Filho FJ, Silva EJ. Preliminary investigation to achieve patency of MB2 canal in maxillary molars. Braz J Oral Sci. 2012;1(3): 373-376.
  18. Cruz A, Vera J, Gascón G, Palafox-Sánchez CA, Amezcua O, Mercado G. Debris remaining in the apical third of root canals after chemomechanical preparation by using sodium hypochlorite and glyde: an in vivo study. J Endod. 2014;40(9):1419-1423.
  19. de Melo Ribeiro MV, Silva-Sousa YT, Versiani MA, Lamira A, Steier L, Pécora JD, de Sousa-Neto MD. Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of self–adjusting file and rotary systems in the apical third of oval-shaped canals. J Endod. 2013;39(3):398-401.
  20. de Sermeño RF, da Silva LA, Herrera H, Herrera H, Silva RA, Leonardo MR. Tissue damage after sodium hypochlorite extrusion during root canal treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108(1):e46-49.
  21. de Souza Filho FJ, Benatti O, de Almeida OP. Influence of the enlargement of the apical foramen in periapical repair of contaminated teeth of dog. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1987;64(4):480-484.
  22. Debelian GJ, Olsen I, Tronstad L. Bacteremia in conjunction with endodontic therapy. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1995;11(3):142-149.
  23. Debelian GJ, Olsen I, Tronstad L. Systemic diseases caused by oral microorganisms. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1994;10(2):57-65.
  24. Debelian GJ, Olsen I, Tronstad L. Anaerobic bacteremia and fungemia in patients undergoing endodontic therapy: an overview. Ann Periodontol; 1998;3(1):281-287.
  25. DeLoughery TG. Hemostasis and thrombosis. 3rd ed. New York: Springer International Publishing; 1999.
  26. Dummer PM, McGinn JH, Rees DG. The position and topography of the apical canal constriction and apical foramen. Int Endod J. 1984;17(4):192-198.
  27. Edwards BJ, Hellstein JW, Jacobsen PL, Kaltman S, Mariotti A, Migliorati CA. Updated recommendations for managing the care of patients receiving oral bisphosphonate therapy: an advisory statement from the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139(12):1674-1677.
  28. Ehrhardt IC, Zuolo ML, Cunha RS, De Martin AS, Kherlakian D, Carvalho MC, Bueno CE. Assessment of the separation incidence of mtwo files used with preflaring: prospective clinical study. J Endod. 2012;38(8):1078-1081.
  29. Ehrich DG, Brian JD Jr, Walker WA. Sodium hypochlorite accident: inadvertent injection into the maxillary sinus. J Endod. 1993;19(4):180-182.
  30. Engstrom B. Correlation of positive culture with the prognosis for root canal treatment. Odontol Revy. 1964;15:257-270.
  31. Faria-Júnior NB, Tanomaru-Filho M, Berbert FL, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM. Antibiofilm activity, pH and solubility of endodontic sealers. Int Endod J. 2013;46(8):755-762.
  32. Fava LR. Calcium hydroxide paste in the maxillary sinus: a case report. Int Endod J. 1993;26(5):306-310.
  33. Flanders DH. Endodontic patency. How to get it. How to keep it. Why it is so important. NY State Dent J. 2002;68(3):30-32.
  34. Fouad AF. Endodontic microbiology. Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.
  35. Gatot A, Arbelle J, Leiberman A, Yanai-Inbar I. Effects of sodium hypochlorite on soft tissues after its inadvertent injection beyond the root apex. J Endod. 1991;17(11):573-574.
  36. Georgopoulou M, Sikaras S, Anastasiadis P. Pain after obturation of the root canals. Hell Stomatol Chron. 1988;32(4):249–254.
  37. Gluskin A. Mishaps and serious complications in endodontic obturation. Endodontic Topics. 2005;12(1):52-70.
  38. Goldberg F, Massone EJ. Patency file and apical transportation: an in vitro study. J Endod 28(7):510-511.
  39. González-Martín M, Torres-Lagares D, Gutiérrez-Pérez JL, Segura-Egea JJ. Inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia after overfilling of endodontic sealer into the mandibular canal. J Endod. 2010;36(8):1419-1421.
  40.  Guneser MB, Arslan D, Usumez A. Tissue dissolution ability of sodium hypochlorite activated by photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming technique. J Endod. 2015;41(5):729-732.
  41.  Gupta A, Epstein JB, Cabay RJ. Bleeding disorders of importance in dental care and related patient management. J Can Dent Assoc.2007;73(1):77-83.
  42. Haapasalo M, Endal U, Zandi H, Coil J. (2005) Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions. Endodontic Topics. 2005;10:77-102.
  43. Hanson CJ, Macluskey M. Irreversible local sequelae of inadvertent extrusion of calcium hydroxide intra-canal medication: a case report. Oral Surgery. 2013;6(3):161-164.
  44. Heimdahl A, Hall G, Hedberg M, Sandberg H, Söder PO, Tunér K, Nord CE. Detection and quantitation by lysis–filtration of bacteremia after different oral surgical procedures. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28(10):2205-2209.
  45. Herrera M, Ábalos C, Lucena C, Jiménez-Planas A, Llamas R. Critical diameter of apical foramen and of file size using the Root ZX apex locator: an in vitro study. J Endod. 2011;37(9):1306-1309.
  46. Holland R, Nery MJ, de Mello W, de Souza V, Bernabé PF, Otoboni Filho JA. Root canal treatment with calcium hydroxide: II. Effect of instrumentation beyond the apices. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1979;47(1):93-96.
  47. Hülsmann M, Hahn W. Complications during root canal irrigation – literature review and case reports. Int Endod J. 2000;33(3):186–183.
  48. Hulsmann M, Peters O, Dummer P. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endodontic Topics. 2005;10: 30–76.
  49. Hülsmann M, Schäfer E. Apical patency: fact and fiction – a myth or a must? A contribution to the discussion. Endodontic Practice Today. 2009;3(4):285–307.
  50. Imura N, Pinheiro ET, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC, Souza-Filho FJ. The outcome of endodontic treatment: a retrospective study of 2000 cases performed by a specialist. J Endod. 2007;3(11):1278-1282.
  51. Ioannidis K, Thomaidis V, Fiska A, Lambrianidis T. Lack of periradicular healing and gradually increasing swelling two years after intentional extrusion of calcium hydroxide into periapical lesion: report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109(6): e86-91.
  52. Johnson WT, Leary JM. Management of dental patients with bleeding disorders: review and update. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1988;6(3):297-303.
  53. Katz H. Endodontic implications of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws: a report of three cases. J Endod. 2005;31(11):831-834.
  54. Kavanagh C, Taylor J. Inadvertent injection of sodium hypochlorite into the maxillary sinus. Br Dent J. 1998;185(7):336-337.
  55. Kerbl FM, DeVilliers P, Litaker M, Eleazer PD. Physical effects of sodium hypochlorite on bone: an ex vivo study. J Endod. 2012;38(3):357-359.
  56. Kirchhoff AL, Fariniuk LF, Mello I. Apical extrusion of debris in flat-oval root canals after using different instrumentation systems. J Endod. 2015;41(2):237-241.
  57. Kleier DJ, Averbach RE, Mehdipour O. The sodium hypochlorite accident: experience of diplomates of the American Board of Endodontics. J Endod. 2008;34(11):1346-1350.
  58. Koçak S, Koçak MM, Sağlam BC, Türker SA, Sağsen B, Er Ö. Apical extrusion of debris using self–adjusting file, reciprocating single–file, and 2 rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod. 2013;39(10):1278-1280.
  59. Köseoğlu BG, Tanrikulu S, Sübay RK, Sencer S. Anesthesia following overfilling of a root canal sealer into the mandibular canal: a case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101(6):803-806.
  60. Kwok V, Caton JG, Polson AM, Hunter PG. Application of evidence-based dentistry: from research to clinical periodontal practice. Periodontol 2000. 2012;59(1):61-74.
  61. Kyrgidis A, Vahtsevanos K. Risk factors for bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(11):2553–2554.
  62. Liang YH, Jiang LM, Jiang L, Chen XB, Liu YY, Tian FC, Bao XD, Gao XJ, Versluis M, Wu MK, van der Sluis L. Radiographic healing after a root canal treatment performed in single-rooted teeth with and without ultrasonic activation of the irrigant: a randomized controlled trial. J Endod 2003;39(10):1218-1225.
  63. Liang YH, Li G, Wesselink PR, Wu MK. Endodontic outcome predictors identified with periapical radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography scans. J Endod. 2011;37(3):326-331.
  64. Madarati AA, Hunter MJ, Dummer PM. Management of intracanal separated instruments. J Endod. 2013;39(5):569-581.
  65. Marais JT, van der Vyver PJ. Invasion of the maxillary sinus with calcium hydroxide. J Dent Assoc S Afr. 1996;51(5):279-281.
  66. Marroquín BB, El–Sayed MA, Willershausen-Zönnchen B. Morphology of the physiological foramen: I. Maxillary and mandibular molars. J Endod. 2004;30(5):321-328.
  67.  McGowan DA. Endodontics and infective endocarditis. Int Endod J. 1982;5(3):127-131.
  68. Meder-Cowherd L, Williamson AE, Johnson WT, Vasilescu D, Walton R, Qian F. Apical morphology of the palatal roots of maxillary molars by using micro–computed tomography. J Endod. 2011;37(8):1162-1165.
  69. Miller SA, Forrest JL. Translating evidence–based decision making into practice: appraising and applying the evidence. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2009;9(4):164-182.
  70. Moinzadeh AT, Shemesh H, Neirynck NA, Aubert C, Wesselink PR. Bisphosphonates and their clinical implications in endodontic therapy. Int Endod J. 2013;46(5):391-398.
  71. Mounce R. Achieving and maintaining apical patency in endodontics: optimizing canal shaping procedures. Gen Dent. 2015;63(1):14-15.
  72. Murray CA, Saunders WP. Root canal treatment and general health: a review of the literature. Int Endod J. 2000;33(1):1-18.
  73. Nair PN. Pathogenesis of apical periodontitis and the causes of endodontic failures. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004;15(6):348-381.
  74. Nair PN Henry S, Cano V, Vera J. Microbial status of apical root canal system of human mandibular first molars with primary apical periodontitis after “one-visit” endodontic treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;99(2):231-252.
  75. Nair PN, Sjögren U, Krey G, Sundqvist G. Therapy-resistant foreign body giant cell granuloma at the periapex of a root-filled human tooth. J Endod. 1990;16(12):589-595.
  76. Noiri Y, Ehara A, Kawahara T, Takemura N, Ebisu S. Participation of bacterial biofilms in refractory and chronic periapical periodontitis. J Endod. 2002;28(10):679-683.
  77. Oliet S. Single-visit endodontics: a clinical study. J Endod. 1983;9(4):147-152.
  78. Olivieri JG, Stöber E, García Font M, González JA, Bragado P, Roig M, Duran-Sindreu F. In vitro comparison in a manikin model: increasing apical enlargement with K3 and K3XF rotary instruments. J Endod. 2014;40(9):1463-1467.
  79. Olsen JJ, Thorn JJ, Korsgaard N, Pinholt EM. Nerve lesions following apical extrusion of non-setting calcium hydroxide: A systematic case review and report of two cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014;42(6):757–762.
  80. Orstavik D, Hörsted-Bindslev P. A comparison of endodontic treatment results at two dental schools. Int Endod J. 1993;26(6):348-354.
  81. Paqué F, Balmer M, Attin T, Peters OA. Preparation of oval-shaped root canals in mandibular molars using nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomography study. J Endod. 2010;36(4):703-707.
  82. Paqué F, Ganahl D, Peters AO. Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography. J Endod. 2009;35(7):1056-1059.
  83. Pashley EL, Birdsong NL, Bowman K, Pashley DH. Cytotoxic effects of NaOCl on vital tissue. J Endod. 1985;11(12):525-528.
  84. Pineda F, Kuttler Y. Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1972;33(1):101-110.
  85. Reddy SA, Hicks ML. Apical extrusion of debris using two hand and two rotary instrumentation techniques. J Endod. 1998;24(3):180-183.
  86. Ricucci D, Russo J, Rutberg M, Burleson JA, Spångberg LS. A prospective cohort study of endodontic treatments of 1,369 root canals: results after five years. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112(6):825-842.
  87. Ricucci D, Siqueira Jr JF. Biofilms and apical periodontitis: study of prevalence and association with clinical and histopathologic findings. J Endod. 2010;36(8):1277-1288.
  88. Rowe AH. Damage to the inferior dental nerve during or following endodontic treatment. Br Dent J. 1983;155(9):306-307.
  89. Saleh IM, Ruyter IE, Haapasalo M, Ørstavik D. Survival of Enterococcus faecalis in infected dentinal tubules after root canal filling with different root canal sealers in vitro. Int Endod J. 2004;37(3):193-198.
  90. Sant’Anna Júnior A, Cavenago BC, Ordinola-Zapata R, De-Deus G, Bramante CM, Duarte MA. The effect of larger apical preparations in the danger zone of lower molares prepared using the Mtwo and Reciproc systems. J Endod. 2014;40(11):1855-1859.
  91. Sarathy AP, Bourgeois Jr SL, Goodell GG. Bisphosphonate–associated osteonecrosis of the jaws and endodontic treatment: two case reports. J Endod. 2005;31(10):759-763.
  92. Savarrio L, Mackenzie D, Riggio M, Saunders WP, Bagg J. Detection of bacteraemias during non-surgical root canal treatment. J Dent. 2005;33(4):293-303.
  93. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am. 1974;18(2):269-296.
  94. Scully C, Ng YL, Gulabivala K. Systemic complications due to endodontic manipulations. Endodontic Topics. 2003;4:60-68.
  95. Scully C, Wolff A. Oral surgery in patients on anticoagulant therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;94(1):57-64.
  96. Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare–ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors. J Endod. 1985;11(11):472-478.
  97. Serper A, Ozbek M, Calt S. Accidental sodium hypochlorite-induced skin injury during endodontic treatment. J Endod. 2004;30(3):180-181.
  98. Seymour RA, Lowry R, Whitworth JM, Martin MV. Infective endocarditis, dentistry and antibiotic prophylaxis; time for a rethink? Br Dent J. 2000;189(11):610-616.
  99. Seymour RA, Preshaw PM, Thomason JM, Ellis JS, Steele JG. Cardiovascular diseases and periodontology.  J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30(4):279-292.
  100. Shapiro A, McKown C. Oral management of patients with bleeding disorders. Part 1: Medical considerations. J Indiana Dent Assoc. 1990;70(1):28-31.
  101. Silva EJ, Menaged K, Ajuz N, Monteiro MR, Coutinho-Filho Tde S. Postoperative pain after foraminal enlargement in anterior teeth with necrosis and apical periodontitis: a prospective and randomized clinical trial. J Endod. 2013;39(2):173-176.
  102. Siqueira JF Jr. Microbial causes of endodontic flare-ups. Int Endod J. 2003;36(7):453-463.
  103. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN (2008) Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J Endod. 2008;34(11):1291-1301.
  104. Sjogren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors affecting the long–term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod. 1990;16(10):498-504.
  105. Soltau J, Zirrgiebel U, Esser N, Schächtele C, Totzke F, Unger C, Merfort I, Drevs J. Antitumoral and antiangiogenic efficacy of bisphosphonates in vitro and in a murine RENCA model. Anticancer Res. 2008;28(2A):933-941.
  106. Souza RA. The importance of apical patency and cleaning of the apical foramen on root canal preparation. Braz Dent J. 2006;17(1):6-9.
  107. Stojicic S, Zivkovic S, Qian W, Zhang H, Haapasalo M. Tissue dissolution by sodium hypochlorite: effect of concentration, temperature, agitation, and surfactant. J Endod. 2010; 36(9):1558-1562.
  108. Strindberg LZ. The dependence of the results of pulp therapy on certain factors: an analytic study based on radiographic and clinical follow-up examinations. Univeristy of Michigan: Mauritzon; 1956.
  109. Tarassoff P, Csermak K. Avascular necrosis of the jaws: risk factors in metastatic cancer patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61(10):1238-1239.
  110. Tinaz AC, Alacam T, Uzun O, Maden M, Kayaoglu G. The effect of disruption of apical constriction on periapical extrusion. J Endod. 2005;31(7):533-535.
  111. Tronstad L, Barnett F, Cervone F. Periapical bacterial plaque in teeth refractory to endodontic treatment. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1990;6(2):73-77.
  112. van der Sluis LW, Shemesh H, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. An evaluation of the influence of passive ultrasonic irrigation on the seal of root canal fillings. Int Endod J. 2007;40(5):356-361.
  113. Verma P, Love RM. A Micro CT study of the mesiobuccal root canal morphology of the maxillary first molar tooth. Int Endod J. 2011;44(3):210-217.
  114. Villas-Bôas MH, Bernardineli N, Cavenago BC, Marciano M, Del Carpio-Perochena A, de Moraes IG, Duarte MH, Bramante CM, Ordinola-Zapata R.  Micro–computed tomography study of the internal anatomy of mesial root canals of mandibular molars. J Endod. 2011;37(12):1682-1686.
  115. Wang SH, Chung MP, Cheng JC, Chen CP, Shieh YS.  Sodium hypochlorite accidentally extruded beyond the apical foramen. J Med Sci. 2010;0: 61-65.
  116. Wong DT, Cheung GS. Extension of bactericidal effect of sodium hypochlorite into dentinal tubules. J Endod. 2014;40(6):825-829.
  117. Wu MK, R’oris A, Barkis D, Wesselink PR. Prevalence and extent of long oval canals in the apical third. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;89(6):739-743.
  118. Yusuf H. The significance of the presence of foreign material periapically as a cause of failure of root treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982;54(5):566-574.
  119. Zou L, Shen Y, Li W, Haapasalo M. Penetration of sodium hypochlorite into dentin. J Endod. 2010;36(5):793-796.

Stay Relevant With Endodontic Practice US

Join our email list for CE courses and webinars, articles and more..

Continuing Education (CE)

The continuing education article below is available to subscribers of Endodontic Practice US. In order to earn continuing education credits, you must be a Free or Paid subscriber and complete a short quiz about the content of the article. Our Free CE is limited to only 2 free credit hours per year.

Purchase a subscription now.

Scroll to Top