Continuing Education (CE)

The continuing education article below is available to subscribers of Endodontic Practice US. In order to earn continuing education credits, you must be a Free or Paid subscriber and complete a short quiz about the content of the article. Our Free CE is limited to only 2 free credit hours per year.

Purchase a subscription now.

Dynamic navigation system: a revolutionary technology for endodontic microsurgery

CE Publish Date: September 18, 2024
CE Expiration Date: September 13, 2027
CEU (Continuing Education Unit):2 Credit(s)
AGD Code: 070

Educational aims and objectives

This self-instructional course for dentists aims to discuss the details regarding dynamic navigation for more accurate and efficient minimally invasive endodontic treatment.

Expected outcomes

Endodontic Practice US subscribers can answer the CE questions by taking the quiz online to earn 2 hours of CE from reading this article. Correctly answering the questions will demonstrate the reader can:

  • Define dynamic navigation.
  • Realize some comparisons between static navigation and dynamic navigation during endodontic treatment.
  • Identify some systems that employ dynamic navigation.
  • Identify components of a dynamic navigation system.
  • Recognize some aspects of the learning curve for guided navigation.
  • Realize some of the benefits of dynamic navigation.
  • Identify some possible future beneficial updates to guided navigation systems.

Access CE Quiz

Read Dr. Frederico Martinho and Bruno Giliolli Bisi’s article on how dynamic navigation is like a GPS for the endodontist’s handpiece and drill.

Drs. Frederico Martinho and Bruno Giliolli Bisi discuss the use of guided navigation in the endodontic practice

Over the past decade, technology has revolutionized endodontics. The ultimate goal of technology is to improve root canal treatment outcomes and tooth survivability rates.1,2 Root canal treatment failure is an ongoing issue despite technological advances; therefore, the search for new technology continues.3

Treating persistent apical periodontitis (PAP) is routine for an endodontist,4 and non-surgical root canal treatment (NSRCR) is one of the treatments for PAP.5 However, NSRCR can be affected by numerous factors.5 Endodontic microsurgery (EMS), which has been widely explored lately, is also a treatment option for PAP. The introduction of new technologies, including magnification and ultrasonics, and the development of new endodontic sealers and retro-filling materials have revolutionized EMS.1

Guided EMS has recently received a lot of attention.7 New technologies have enabled surgeons to treat more complex cases with more predictable outcomes. It allows the surgeon to deliver a more accurate and efficient minimally invasive treatment.2 Guided EMS requires pre-surgical planning in planning software, and the surgery can be delivered under static or dynamic navigation.

Static navigation requires printing a 3D surgical guide.9 Several studies have shown that surgical guides improve EMS accuracy and efficiency when compared to freehand.3 However, surgical guide design and production have a complex workflow with numerous steps that can be time-consuming and require multiple appointments.4 Additionally, the software for surgical planning, 3D printing, and other related functions requires some surgical knowledge and training.

Figures 1A-1F: X-Guide workflow. 1A. X-Clip fit. 1B. CBCT scan. 1C. Surgical planning. 1D.
DNS trackers calibration. 1E. System check. 1F. Live navigation screen

The Dynamic Navigation System (DNS) is a new technology in endodontics, and it is like a GPS for the handpiece and the drill.5 DNS has a more straightforward workflow (Figure 1) and is less time-consuming than static navigation.6 Previous studies revealed DNS’s high accuracy and efficiency for EMS.7 DNS enables the surgeon to deliver a minimally invasive EMS. Its high accuracy allows endodontists to conduct EMS in more difficult cases, such as areas with no direct visualization and close to vital anatomical structures. To date, DNS has been explored for different EMS steps, including bone window,8 osteotomy, and root-end resection (RER).9 DNS can improve the accuracy and efficiency of EMS performed both by novice and experienced endodontists.10

Dynamic Navigation System

Currently, only a few companies offer DNS. These include the X-Guide® (X-Nav Technologies, Lansdale, Pennsylvania), the Navident (ClaroNav, Toronto, Canada), the ImplaNav™ (Bres Medical, Ingleburn, Australia), and the Denacam (Liestal, Switzerland). All these DNS systems share a similar navigation concept despite different manufacturers. These DNS software applications are overall very user-friendly with a straightforward workflow.

Figures 2A-2D: DNS trackers for the X-Guide software (X-Nav Techologies, Lansdale, Pennsylvania). 2A. Handpiece tracker assembled. 2B. Patient’s tracker attached to the X-Clip. 2C. X-guide system. 2D. Tracking camera using violet light

DNS has numerous components. The main components include a central console, a display for the user interface, a section in the upper part containing motion-tracking cameras, and a lighting system, which varies from manufacturer to manufacturer (Figure 2). The cameras identify the DNS trackers that are attached to the patient’s face and to the handpiece and create a precise 3D model of the surgical site and the handpiece’s relation to the site regarding the angle, spatial position, and drilling depth.5

To plan for DNS surgery, the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) file is directly uploaded into the DNS software. A key advantage of the DNS is that it does not require separate software to open and visualize the CBCT scan. Once the CBCT scan DICOM file is in the DNS software, the surgeon can plan the EMS procedure. After surgical planning, the DNS software requires a calibration step, in which the software recognizes the trackers attached to the handpiece and the patient’s dentition and memorizes their geometry to ensure that the handpiece and the drill are accurately represented on the planned drilling path. It has been suggested that the pre-surgical steps should not take more than a total of 15 minutes.6 After calibration, the DNS software becomes live for navigation, guiding the user to the drill at the correct angle and position. The DNS software guides drilling in real-time, and when the desired depth is reached, the DNS software indicates to stop, and the procedure is completed.

DNS has a learning curve like other technologies. It is crucial to undergo thorough training before treating a patient although the DNS is easy to operate, which makes the DNS learning curve less steep. A relatively low number of trial attempts are sufficient to calibrate the operator on DNS prior to the surgery.11 A previous study showed that after 20 trial attempts, both novice and experienced endodontists delivered EMS more accurately and efficiently than freehand.5 Overall, the DNS has a less challenging learning curve and is easy to fit into the surgeon’s existing EMS workflow.

Figures 3A-3F: Root-end resection using DNS (X-Guide software). 3A. Live navigation for the linear cuts. 3B-3D. Live navigation screen representation over the axial, coronal, and sagittal CBCT scan plans. 3E. Ultrasonic tip (P1B, Helse Ultrasonics, SP, Brazil). 3F. DNS 3D- live navigation

Dynamic Navigation System EMS studies

Early studies evaluated the accuracy and efficiency of DNS for osteotomy and RER.9,10,12,13 Accuracy is a primary concern when performing EMS (Figure 3), especially in areas close to important anatomical structures, in which small deviations could lead to partial or irreversible damage to local structures. Surgical time is critical for EMS, and cutting down the EMS time is desirable. Optimizing the EMS surgical time with technology could avoid operator and patient fatigue, loss of anesthesia, and excessive bleeding, which can affect visibility and the outcome of the surgery. It is worth highlighting that the longer the surgical time, the higher the risk of technical error. Therefore, keeping the surgical time short using technology could also help to prevent mishaps.

Early studies have compared the accuracy and efficiency of DNS to the freehand method.13 Despite no fair comparison, it was still important at that time to prove that the DNS technology could enable the surgeon to conduct a more accurate and efficient EMS than the freehand existing method.

EMS involves many steps, including osteotomy, root-end resection, root-end cavity preparation, and root-end filling.14 All these steps are crucial for EMS success.15 Each EMS step can be a source of error, and cumulative errors can ultimately impact the EMS outcome and longevity of the tooth. To date, DNS has been mainly explored for osteotomy, bone-window cut, and root-end resection.8,9,10,12,13 Previous studies have demonstrated the high accuracy and efficiency of DNS for osteotomy and root-end resection.9,16 Most of these studies indicated 2D- and 3D-deviation metrics below or close to 2 mm.10,12 Moreover, these studies also showed a lesser root-end resection angle compared to freehand surgery.9

Figures 4A-4C: Bone window cut with DNS. 4A. Linear cuts for the bone window using Ultrasonic tip (P1B, Helse Ultrasonics, SP, Brazil). 4B. Bone window. 4C. Distal root-end resection following the bone window

Bone window or “bony lid” surgery was introduced in 1987 for direct surgical access to the apical root of mandibular molars for root-end resection16 (Figure 4). It is an alternative surgical method to conventional osteotomy using burs or drills. The procedure involves preparing and removing a bone window, which is then reinserted into its original position after the surgery. One advantage of bone window surgery is that it preserves and maintains bone that would have been removed by conventional osteotomy with burs (Figure 4). The bone window works as an autogenous graft without substitute materials for guided tissue regeneration providing essential bone remodeling factors, including osteoinductive molecules, proper scaffolding, and osteogenic cells.18,19

Figures 5A-5B: DNS Live screen for the bone window cut. 5A. Representation of the straight-cutting alignment and guidance on bone window procedure. 5B. 3D pre-surgical planning for bone window cut

Recently, DNS was successfully applied for a bone-window surgery8 study which was the first to integrate X-Guide software into a piezoelectric device for bone window cutting in EMS (Figure 5). The authors showed that DNS improved the accuracy and efficiency of EMS piezosurgery. Piezosurgery’s many advantages include the ability to perform minimally invasive procedures, preserve neurovasular structures, control bleeding, and reduce thermal damage.23,24 The piezosurgery preserves more of the cancellous properties and more osteocytes than traditional osteotomy.22 Moreover, piezosurgery offers less edema, less trismus, reduced pain, and improved quality of life after the surgery.23

The DNS has several applications in endodontics.24,25 In addition to EMS, DNS has been mainly tested for intraosseous anesthesia, conservative access, locating calcified canals, root post-removal, and root post-preparation.5

Future directions

DNS will be updated with new features as the technology evolves. Endodontic techniques and applications are encouraged. Recent studies integrated DNS into augmented reality (AR) headsets for mixed reality.26 AR is one of the biggest technology trends in the medical field. DNS integration into the AR headset allowed the surgeon to overlay the high-definition AR content of the live output display from the navigation system near the surgical site through the Microsoft HoloLens 2 AR headset. AR integration with DNS improved surgeons’ hand-eye coordination and also overcame 3D DNS’s disadvantage, which was the need to simultaneously pay attention to both the surgical site as well as the output of the DNS display. The HoloLens AR headset allowed the operator to remain focused on the surgical site while drilling for RER and osteotomy without having to look away at the DNS monitor.16 The DNS has attracted attention from both clinicians and researchers lately. As the DNS technology advances, more studies are needed to evaluate the clinical accuracy and efficiency of DNS for EMS.

Read Dr. Steven L. Frost’s article about how dynamic navigation and other technologies can keep endodontic offices open to new possibilities! https://endopracticeus.com/a-look-ahead-to-whats-new/.

Author Info

Frederico Martinho, DDS, MSc, PhD, is currently a Clinical Professor in Endodontics at the University of Maryland School of Dentistry since 2017. He has lectured nationally and internationally and published over 100 scientific articles in peer-reviewed journals. He has received Journal of Endodontics publication awards and an honorable mention in 2017, 2018, and 2022. He is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of the Journal of Endodontics and a reviewer for numerous endodontic and dental journals. Dr. Martinho has authored cutting-edge technology scientific articles in endodontic microsurgery. He is currently a member of the Research and Scientific Affairs Committee and the Special Committee for the Endodontic Educator Fellowship Awards from the American Association of Endodontists Foundation (AAEF). He is the 2022 recipient of the Educator Fellowship Award from the AAEF.

 

Bruno Giliolli Bisi, DDS, MSc, PhD, candidate, is currently a visiting scientist at the Division of Endodontics at the University of Maryland School of Dentistry, a PhD Candidate at the University of São Paulo (Brazil), and also a Clinical Professor in Endodontics at Metodista University of São Paulo (Brazil). Dr. Bisi is an active member of the American Association of Endodontics (AAE), the Brazilian Endodontics Society (SBENDO), and the Brazilian division of IADR (SBPqO). He has worked as an endodontist for 10 years part-time and is now developing research related to dynamic navigation.

 

Disclosures: Drs. Martinho and Bisi report no financial relationships to disclose.

References

  1. Dioguardi M, Stellacci C, La Femina L, Spirito F, Sovereto D, Laneve E, Manfredonia MF, D’Alessandro A, Ballini A, Cantore S, Lo Muzio L, Troiano G. Comparison of Endodontic Failures between Nonsurgical Retreatment and Endodontic Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jul 4;58(7):894.
  2. Connert T, Zehnder MS, Amato M, Weiger R, Kühl S, Krastl G. Microguided Endodontics: a method to achieve minimally invasive access cavity preparation and root canal location in mandibular incisors using a novel computer-guided technique. Int Endod J. 2018 Feb;51(2):247-255.
  3. La Rosa GRM, Peditto M, Venticinque A, Marcianò A, Bianchi A, Pedullà E. Advancements in guided surgical endodontics: A scoping review of case report and case series and research implications. Aust Endod J. 2024 Aug;50(2):397-408.
  4. Buniag AG, Pratt AM, Ray JJ. Targeted Endodontic Microsurgery: A Retrospective Outcomes Assessment of 24 Cases. J Endod. 2021 May;47(5):762-769.
  5. Martinho FC, Griffin IL, Corazza BJM. Current Applications of Dynamic Navigation System in Endodontics: A Scoping Review. Eur J Dent. 2023 Jul;17(3):569-586.
  6. Martinho FC, Bisi BG, Gavini G, Griffin IL, Tordik PA. Comparison of the Accuracy and Efficiency of Two Dynamic Navigation System Workflow for Fiber-post Removal: Small versus Large Field-of-view Registration Workflows. J Endod. 2024 Jun 28:S0099-2399(24)00363-00367.
  7. Geo TG, Saxena P, Gupta S. Static vs. dynamic navigation for endodontic microsurgery – A comparative review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2022 Jul-Aug;12(4):410-412. Epub 2022 May 17. Erratum in: J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024 Jul-Aug;14(4):358-359.
  8. Martinho FC, Griffin IL, Tordik PA. Piezoelectric Device and Dynamic Navigation System Integration for Bone Window-Guided Surgery. J Endod. 2023 Dec;49(12):1698-1705.
  9. Dianat O, Nosrat A, Mostoufi B, Price JB, Gupta S, Martinho FC. Accuracy and efficiency of guided root-end resection using a dynamic navigation system: a human cadaver study. Int Endod J. 2021 May;54(5):793-801.
  10. Martinho FC, Aldahmash SA, Cahill TY, Gupta S, Dianat O, Mostoufi B, Price JB, Griffin I, Tordik PA. Comparison of the Accuracy and Efficiency of a 3-Dimensional Dynamic Navigation System for Osteotomy and Root-end Resection Performed by Novice and Experienced Endodontists. J Endod. 2022 Oct;48(10):1327-1333.
  11. Wang W, Zhuang M, Tao B, Wang F, Wu Y. Learning curve of dynamic navigation-assisted zygomatic implant surgery: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Jul;132(1):178.e1-178.e12.
  12. Martinho FC, Rollor C, Westbrook K, Aldahmash SA, Fay GG, Rivera E, Parsa A, Price JB, Tordik PA. A Cadaver-based Comparison of Sleeve-guided Implant-drill and Dynamic Navigation Osteotomy and Root-end Resections. J Endod. 2023 Aug;49(8):1004-1011.
  13. Aldahmash SA, Price JB, Mostoufi B, Griffin IL, Dianat O, Tordik PA, Martinho FC. Real-time 3-dimensional Dynamic Navigation System in Endodontic Microsurgery: A Cadaver Study. J Endod. 2022 Jul;48(7):922-929.
  14. Floratos S, Kim S. Modern Endodontic Microsurgery Concepts: A Clinical Update. Dent Clin North Am. 2017 Jan;61(1):81-91.
  15. Chong BS, Rhodes JS. Endodontic surgery. Br Dent J. 2014 Mar;216(6):281-90.
  16. Martinho FC, Griffin IL, Price JB, Tordik PA. Augmented Reality and 3-Dimensional Dynamic Navigation System Integration for Osteotomy and Root-end Resection. J Endod. 2023 Oct;49(10):1362-1368.
  17. Khoury F, Hensher R. The bony lid approach for the apical root resection of lower molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987 Apr;16(2):166-170.
  18. Mittal M, Vashisth P, Arora R, Dwivedi S. Combined endodontic therapy and periapical surgery with MTA and bone graft in treating palatogingival groove. BMJ Case Rep. 2013 Apr 18;2013:bcr2013009056.
  19. Lee SM, Yu YH, Wang Y, Kim E, Kim S. The Application of “Bone Window” Technique in Endodontic Microsurgery. J Endod. 2020 Jun;46(6):872-880.
  20. Hennet P. Piezoelectric Bone Surgery: A Review of the Literature and Potential Applications in Veterinary Oromaxillofacial Surgery. Front Vet Sci. 2015 May 5;2:8.
  21. Bharathi J, Mittal S, Tewari S, Tewari S, Duhan J, Sangwan P, Kumar V. Effect of the Piezoelectric Device on Intraoperative Hemorrhage Control and Quality of Life after Endodontic Microsurgery: A Randomized Clinical Study. J Endod. 2021 Jul;47(7):1052-1060.
  22. Mouraret S, Houschyar KS, Hunter DJ, Smith AA, Jew OS, Girod S, Helms JA. Cell viability after osteotomy and bone harvesting: comparison of piezoelectric surgery and conventional bur. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Aug;43(8):966-971.
  23. Al-Moraissi EA, Elmansi YA, Al-Sharaee YA, Alrmali AE, Alkhutari AS. Does the piezoelectric surgical technique produce fewer postoperative sequelae after lower third molar surgery than conventional rotary instruments? A systematic review and meta analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Mar;45(3):383-391.
  24. Mekhdieva E, Del Fabbro M, Alovisi M, Scotti N, Comba A, Berutti E, Pasqualini D. Dynamic Navigation System vs. Free-Hand Approach in Microsurgical and Non-Surgical Endodontics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies. J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 8;12(18):5845.
  25. Vasudevan A, Santosh SS, Selvakumar RJ, Sampath DT, Natanasabapathy V. Dynamic Navigation in Guided Endodontics – A Systematic Review. Eur Endod J. 2022 Jun;7(2):81-91.
  26. Martinho FC, Qadir SJ, Griffin IL, Melo MAS, Fay GG. Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Device and Dynamic Navigation System for Postremoval in Maxillary Molars. J Endod. 2024 Jun;50(6):844-851.

Stay Relevant With Endodontic Practice US

Join our email list for CE courses and webinars, articles and more..

Scroll to Top